
-
Once a crumbling relic of old Iran, brewery reborn as arts hub
-
Djokovic seeks Indian Wells resurgence with help from Murray
-
Musk's SpaceX faces new Starship setback
-
Trump signs executive order establishing 'Strategic Bitcoin Reserve'
-
Australian casino firm scrambles for cash to survive
-
NYC High Line architect Scofidio dead at 89
-
Musk's SpaceX faces setback with new Starship upper stage loss
-
Australians told 'prepare for worst' as tropical cyclone nears
-
Clark edges two clear at Arnold Palmer Invitational
-
Super cool: ATP sensation Fonseca learning to deal with demands of fame
-
Trump again casts doubt on his commitment to NATO
-
EU leaders agree defence boost as US announces new talks with Kyiv
-
48 killed in 'most violent' Syria unrest since Assad ouster: monitor
-
US and European stocks gyrate on tariffs and growth
-
Deja vu on the Moon: Private US spaceship again lands awkwardly
-
Brazilian teen Fonseca into Indian Wells second round
-
Abortion access under threat in Milei's Argentina
-
Trump backs off Mexico, Canada tariffs after market blowback
-
Trump car tariff pivot and Detroit's 'Big Three'
-
Man Utd draw in Spain in Europa League last 16 as Spurs beaten
-
California's Democratic governor says trans women in sports 'unfair'
-
Trump says Musk should use 'scalpel' not 'hatchet' in govt cuts
-
Goodall, Shatner to receive environmentalist awards from Sierra Club
-
Dingwall glad to be 'the glue' of England's back-line against Italy
-
Chelsea edge Copenhagen in Conference League last 16 first leg
-
Real Sociedad fight back to earn Man United draw in Europa League
-
Chunky canines: Study reveals dog obesity gene shared by humans
-
Europe rallies behind Zelensky as US announces new talks with Kyiv
-
Drop in US border crossings goes deeper than Trump
-
Guyana appeals to UN court as Venezuelan plans vote in disputed zone
-
Private US spaceship lands near Moon's south pole in uncertain condition
-
Saudi PIF to pay 'up to 12 months maternity leave' for tennis players
-
16 killed in 'most violent' Syria unrest since Assad ouster: monitor
-
Peru farmer confident ahead of German court battle with energy giant
-
US-Hamas talks complicate Gaza truce efforts: analysts
-
European rocket successfully carries out first commercial mission
-
SpaceX gears up for Starship launch as Musk controversy swirls
-
Trump backs off Mexico tariffs while Canada tensions simmer
-
Europe's new rocket blasts off on first commercial mission
-
SpaceX gearing up for Starship launch amid Musk controversy
-
Racked by violence, Haiti faces 'humanitarian catastrophe': MSF
-
Gisele Pelicot's daughter says has filed sex abuse case against father
-
New Zealand set for 'scrap' with India on slower pitch: Santner
-
US signals broader tariff reprieve for Canada, Mexico as trade gap grows
-
US to carry out first firing squad execution since 2010
-
Roy Ayers, godfather of neo-soul, dead at 84
-
ECB chief warns of 'risks all over' as rates cut again
-
Albania to shut down TikTok in coming days
-
Pompidou museum invites public for last look before renovation
-
Graham returns for Scotland's Six Nations match against Wales

Controversial carbon credits flood COP28, yet still no rules
The COP28 climate talks have been flooded with announcements hyping controversial carbon credits before rules for them have been hammered out, with environmental groups fearing "greenwashing" on a massive scale.
The concept behind the credits has taken a major hit recently as scientific research has repeatedly shown claims of reduced emissions under the schemes are often hugely overestimated -- or simply non-existent.
Carbon credits allow corporations -- or countries under certain conditions -- to offset their greenhouse gas emissions.
One credit equals the reduction or removal of one tonne of CO2 from the atmosphere, often in developing countries by projects focusing on things like fighting deforestation.
Scientists stress that any offsetting should not be used as a passport to continue polluting, with emissions needing to fall by almost half this decade to meet global warming goals.
US climate envoy John Kerry declared on Sunday that his country's Energy Transition Accelerator for developing nations -- one of a number being touted -- as a "bold new idea" .
However environmental groups quickly expressed scepticism, pointing to the past failures of similar schemes.
The initiative -- a partnership between the US government, the Rockefeller Foundation and billionaire Jeff Bezos's Earth Fund -- aims to shift developing countries from dirty to clean fuel.
Under the scheme, companies -- and potentially countries -- will be able to buy credits for carbon emissions from projects that do things like boost renewable energy, build electrical transmission lines or "retire" coal plants.
- 'Smoke and mirrors' -
Amazon, Bank of America, Mastercard, McDonald's, Morgan Stanley, PepsiCo and Walmart are some of the US corporate giants lining up to pilot projects in Chile, the Dominican Republic and Nigeria.
Kerry said the initiative could generate tens of billions of dollars, insisting the credits will be "high integrity" and "not the kind of carbon crediting that you read about in some headlines."
He was referring to a series of investigations in recent months that have raised doubts about the effectiveness and integrity of the vast majority of carbon credits already in circulation.
Erika Lennon, a lawyer for the Center for International Environmental Law, said the announcement was "merely smoke and mirrors distracting from the US's paltry contribution to climate finance".
Washington said it was working with the World Bank to ensure the quality of the credits.
Separately on Friday, the World Bank said it had plans to help 15 developing countries in Africa, Southeast Asia and Latin America to earn money from carbon credits by 2028 for forest protection.
Such projects have previously been shown to be the least reliable for reducing emissions, but the World Bank insisted its scheme would be of "high integrity".
AFP has also identified hundreds of events dedicated to carbon credits at COP28, many led by companies seeking a way to compensate -- at least on paper -- for their carbon footprint.
- Vagueness -
Many different players have rushed to set up their own carbon credit rules, slowing down negotiations for a common regulatory framework, according to environmental groups.
This absence of common rules has given companies free rein to engage in widely-criticised offsetting as part of a voluntary carbon credit market.
At COP28, negotiators have been tasked with looking into applying Article Six of the 2015 Paris Agreement.
It allows countries to cooperate on hitting their emissions-reduction targets -- including by swapping carbon credits.
It also envisages a reform of the global carbon credit market that has been dragging on for years.
The Climate Action Network, which brings together hundreds of environmental groups, was scathing about the lack of ambition.
"Just like last year, we feel the draft (agreement) is more likely to remove ambition from climate action than carbon dioxide from the atmosphere," it added.
The network also criticised the vagueness of planned rules for a future UN supervisory body overseeing a global carbon market, which it said could leave the "door too wide open for risky practices" and to protect the rights of the communities involved.
These contentious rules could still be pushed through by countries impatient to start offsetting their emissions, led by wealthy and oil-producing nations -- and possibly developing countries keen to reap vast sums from the market.
On Friday, around 10 countries including the United States, France and the UAE -- as well as Colombia, Kenya and Senegal -- called for carbon markets to be "complementary" to efforts to reduce emissions.
They said that there must be "transparency" and "high-integrity standards" for these markets to reach their potential.
A.Mahlangu--AMWN