-
England-born Inglis relishes 'special' century for Australia
-
Pussy Riot stages pre-election Berlin show for Ukraine
-
Leverkusen ease to victory at Kiel to trim Bayern lead
-
'Now it's over' says Hermoso after Rubiales found guilty
-
Germany on eve of vote expected to see far-right surge
-
Spurs revitalised after Ipswich rout: Postecoglou
-
Russell misses prove costly as England edge Scotland in Six Nations
-
Milei says welcomes Trump plan for reciprocal tariffs
-
Premier League title out of Arsenal's control, says 'angry' Arteta
-
Asensio double punishes Jorgensen howler as Villa beat Chelsea
-
Lille deepen Monaco's woes
-
Alvarez double takes Atletico top with Valencia win
-
Norwegian film 'Dreams', Australia's Rose Byrne win at Berlin
-
French star Jaminet returns after ban for 'stupid' racism
-
England edge Scotland in Six Nations thriller
-
England edge Scotland 16-15 in Six Nations thriller
-
Israel stalls Palestinians' release after six Gaza hostages freed
-
Pope suffers respiratory attack, condition critical: Vatican
-
French convict freed in murderous ambush is arrested in Romania
-
Andreeva, 17, makes WTA history with help from LeBron and Federer
-
Nowitzki 'disappointed and sad' for Doncic after trade
-
Japan's Forever Young wins $20mln Saudi Cup
-
One dead, several police wounded in 'Islamist' knife attack in France
-
Ireland hail supersub energy, Wales see solace in defeat
-
One dead, several police officers wounded in 'Islamist' knife attack
-
Arsenal's Premier League title hopes suffer Hammer blow
-
Rublev outlasts Draper to take second Doha title
-
Inglis trumps Duckett as Australia defeat England in record chase
-
Israel suspends prisoner release after six Gaza hostages freed: sources
-
One dead, several police officers wounded in knife attack in France
-
Thousands join Hungarians judges' rally
-
Andreeva, 17, becomes youngest WTA 1000 champion
-
Arsenal title bid rocked by West Ham, Man Utd rescue Everton draw
-
Prendergast leads Ireland to victory over Wales in Six Nations
-
France says convict freed in May shootout arrested in Romania
-
'Soft' Man Utd have to survive this season, says Amorim
-
Pakistan coach says 'match-winning' fast bowlers key in India clash
-
Zelensky 'not ready' to sign minerals deal with US: source
-
Fernandes inspires Man Utd fightback for Everton draw
-
France's agriculture show, an outlet for angry farmers
-
Brignone claims Sestriere giant slalom double after Shiffrin flops out
-
Two in a row for Merlier at UAE Tour
-
Clash with Pakistan just another game, says India batsman Gill
-
Londoners march in support of Ukraine to mark three years of war
-
Duckett ton drives England to 351-8 against Australia in Champions Trophy
-
Syrian suspect in Berlin stabbing wanted 'to kill Jews': police
-
Hamas frees 6 Israeli hostages in latest transfer under truce
-
China's EV maker XPeng eyes doubling global presence by year's end
-
Hamas frees 5 Israeli hostages in latest transfer under truce
-
Germany on eve of elections under shadow of US-European rift
China, Trump, and the power of war?
As tensions in the Taiwan Strait continue to simmer, foreign policy experts are exploring a hypothetical scenario: If China were to launch a military attack on Taiwan, would a newly re-elected President Donald Trump intervene with the full might of the U.S. armed forces to defend the island? This question underscores the complex interplay of regional alliances, global power dynamics, and the unpredictability of American politics.
Setting the Stage: China’s Military Ambitions
Historical Context:
China regards Taiwan as a breakaway province destined for reunification—by force if necessary.
Modern Capabilities:
The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has accelerated its modernization program, including advancements in naval power, ballistic missiles, and air force technology.
Regional Impact:
An attack on Taiwan could destabilize not only East Asia but also the global economy, given Taiwan’s crucial role in semiconductor manufacturing and maritime trade routes.
The Trump Factor: A New Administration’s Possible Response
Campaign Promises and Rhetoric:
Donald Trump has a record of strong nationalist rhetoric, emphasizing American military strength. If re-elected, he might lean into campaign pledges to protect U.S. interests abroad, including key allies and partners.
Previous Policies on China:
In his earlier administration, Trump took a hardline stance against Beijing on trade, technology, and security. This history suggests he could respond forcefully if China initiates open conflict.
Alliance with Taiwan:
Although the U.S. does not maintain formal diplomatic ties with Taipei, it is bound by the Taiwan Relations Act to provide defensive support. A President Trump might interpret this as a mandate to escalate, including mobilizing U.S. forces.
Potential Military Scenarios
Naval Blockade:
The U.S. Navy could intervene by establishing a defensive perimeter around Taiwan, deterring Chinese amphibious assaults. Warship deployments to the region would send a clear signal of U.S. resolve, but also increase the risk of direct engagement.
Air Superiority Campaign:
If China’s air force attempted to dominate the skies over Taiwan, the U.S. Air Force and Navy’s carrier air wings could provide critical support to Taiwan’s defense. This scenario would significantly escalate hostilities, potentially leading to sustained aerial combat.
Economic and Cyber Warfare:
Rather than committing large numbers of troops, Trump could opt for widespread sanctions on China, coupled with cyber operations to disrupt PLA communication and logistics. This approach would be aggressive yet potentially less risky than a full-scale military confrontation.
Risks and Global Ramifications
Escalation to Major Conflict:
Direct clashes between the U.S. and China could spiral rapidly, raising concerns about nuclear brinkmanship.
Economic Fallout:
Heightened tensions may lead to severe disruptions in global supply chains, especially regarding technology and semiconductor industries.
International Alliances:
A U.S. military response would likely draw in regional allies such as Japan, South Korea, and Australia, with NATO partners possibly offering political or limited logistical support.
Diplomatic Alternatives
Negotiated Settlements: Even in a crisis, there might be space for last-minute talks hosted by neutral countries or facilitated by international bodies like the United Nations. Multinational Coalitions: The U.S. might seek to build coalitions with allies in Europe and Asia to present a united front, pressuring Beijing to halt aggression.
Conclusion: An Uncertain Future
Should China take the drastic step of attacking Taiwan, the question of American intervention under a potential new Trump administration looms large. Historical precedent—along with Trump’s combative stance on foreign policy—suggests a robust response could follow. Yet the costs, both human and economic, would be staggering for all sides involved.
In this hypothetical scenario, much depends on Beijing’s calculations of risk versus reward, as well as Trump’s willingness to gamble on a major conflict to assert U.S. influence and uphold a promise to protect American allies. Ultimately, the future of Taiwan’s sovereignty could hinge on whether deterrence succeeds—or if the world’s two largest economies find themselves at the brink of war.