-
Swiatek stunned at Miami Open by 50th-ranked Linette
-
Italy, Germany and France offer help with Hormuz only after ceasefire
-
US-backed airstrikes leave Ecuador border communities in fear
-
'Blackmail': EU leaders round on Orban for stalling Ukraine loan
-
Displacement, bombs and air raid sirens weigh on Mideast Eid celebrations
-
James ties NBA record for most regular-season games played
-
BTS to drop new album ahead of comeback mega-gig
-
Netanyahu says Iran 'decimated,' Tehran targets Gulf petro-facilities
-
Carrick uncertain if Man Utd defender De Ligt will return this season
-
US, Israel tactics diverge on Iran as Trump's goals still 'fuzzy'
-
Japan PM placates Trump on Iran, but faces Pearl Harbor surprise
-
Brazil presidential hopeful Flavio Bolsonaro praises Bukele
-
The Iran war and the cost of killing 'bad guys'
-
US stocks cut losses on Netanyahu war comments as energy prices soar again
-
Forest beat Midtjylland on penalties to reach Europa League quarters
-
Netanyahu says Iran decimated as Tehran warns of 'zero restraint' in energy attacks
-
Salvadoran anti-corruption lawyer jailed to 'silence her', husband says
-
California to rename Cesar Chavez Day after sex abuse claims
-
Yazidi woman tells French court of rape, slavery and escape from IS
-
New FIFA ruling boosts prospects for women coaches
-
Megan Jones to captain England in Women's Six Nations
-
Trump says told Netanyahu not to attack Iran gas fields
-
MLS reveals shortened 2027 campaign details
-
FIFA planning for World Cup to 'go ahead as scheduled' amid Iran uncertainty
-
Braves outfielder Profar's full MLB season ban upheld: report
-
Mideast war exposing Europe's reliance on Gulf flights, airlines warn
-
Ghalibaf: Iran's new strongman running war effort
-
UN shipping body urges 'safe maritime corridor' in Gulf
-
Venezuelan student freed after months in US immigration custody
-
Trump to Japan PM: 'Why didn't you tell me about Pearl Harbor?'
-
US mulls lifting sanctions on Iranian oil at sea despite war on Tehran
-
IMF raises concern over global inflation, output over Iran war
-
Middle East war weighs on global trade outlook: WTO
-
Cunningham out for NBA Pistons with collapsed lung
-
Belarus frees 250 political prisoners in US-brokered deal
-
Iran attacks on gas and oil refineries heighten fears over war fallout
-
Fernandez 'completely committed' to Chelsea insists Rosenior
-
Call to add Nazi camps to UNESCO list
-
England cricket chiefs to front up to media over Ashes flop
-
'Miracle': Europe reconnects with lost spacecraft
-
Nigeria 'challenged by terrorism', president says on UK state visit
-
Woltemade deployed too deep to be dangerous at Newcastle, says Nagelsmann
-
Wimbledon expansion plan gets legal boost
-
EU summit fails to rally Orban behind stalled Ukraine loan
-
New Morocco coach praises 'well-deserved' Cup of Nations decision
-
Senegal to appeal CAF Africa Cup of Nations decision
-
'Mixing things up': Nagelsmann goes for flexibility in new Germany squad
-
Record-setter Hodgkinson hopes 'fourth time lucky' at world indoors
-
Atletico target Romero says his focus on Spurs' survival bid
-
Karalis hits prime form to threaten Duplantis surprise
Brazil high court resumes key Indigenous lands case
Brazil's Supreme Court resumed hearings Wednesday in a closely watched case on whether to restrict native peoples' rights to claim their ancestral lands, a key buffer against climate change.
Hundreds of Indigenous protesters, many in traditional feather headdresses, rallied in the capital Brasilia as the court weighed the legality of the so-called "time-frame argument," which holds that native peoples should not have the right to lands where they were not present in 1988, when the current constitution was ratified.
Indigenous groups say that violates their rights, given that many were forced from their ancestral lands, including during the military dictatorship that ruled Brazil from the 1960s to 1980s.
The Supreme Court began hearing the case in 2021, but has adjourned the proceedings several times.
So far, two of the court's 11 justices have sided with the Indigenous plaintiffs, and two against them, one of these a judge who announced his stance on Wednesday.
The proceedings were to resume on Thursday with the remaining seven judges due to state their opinion.
Climate campaigners have joined Indigenous activists in pressing for the court to reject the time-frame argument, given that numerous studies have found that protected Indigenous reservations are one of the best ways to fight deforestation and, with it, global warming.
"The argument ignores our constitutional rights to our ancestral lands, puts existing Indigenous reservations at risk and makes creating new ones unviable," Dinamam Tuxa, coordinator of the Association of Brazil's Indigenous Peoples (APIB), told AFP ahead of the trial.
Indigenous rights groups have dubbed the case the "trial of the century."
The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights said in a statement that a win for the time-frame limitation argument would be "a big setback" for the rights of Indigenous people in Brazil and go against international human rights norms.
The limitation is backed by Brazil's powerful agribusiness lobby, which scored a victory in May when the lower house of Congress passed a bill enshrining the 1988 cutoff in law.
The bill is now working its way through the Senate.
Leftist President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, a self-described ally of Indigenous peoples, is expected to veto the bill if it passes. But Congress, where the agribusiness coalition is a major player, could override a veto.
The case could enter murky legal territory if that happens before the Supreme Court's justices finish delivering their rulings.
The constitution makes no mention of a cutoff date in relation to Indigenous reservations.
Indigenous reservations cover 11.6 percent of Brazil's territory, notably in the Amazon rainforest.
Brazil has around 1.7 million Indigenous inhabitants -- 0.8 percent of the population.
J.Oliveira--AMWN