- Sean 'Diddy' Combs sex trafficking trial set for May 2025
- Bolivia stun Colombia in World Cup qualifiers
- Internet Archive reels from 'catastrophic' cyberattack, data breach
- Greece earn late win against England in Nations League, Italy-Belgium stalemate
- Trump biopic 'The Apprentice' hits US theaters weeks before election
- Pavlidis dedicates 'special' Greece win over England to tragic Baldock
- Wall Street stocks retreat from records on US inflation data
- 'Like a quake': Beirut shaken after deadliest strikes on centre
- Fallen giants Ghana in AFCON trouble after Sudan draw
- Asian leaders meet in Laos with US, Russia on world turmoil
- England gamble backfires as Pavlidis fires emotional Greece to victory
- Obama stumps for Harris, Trump talks US protectionism
- New-look France ease past Israel in Nations League
- Belgium fight back to draw with 10-man Italy in Nations League
- 'Get a life': Hurricane whips up US election storm
- Japan stay perfect in World Cup qualifying
- Relief as Lebanon evacuees dock in Turkey
- Lebanon says 22 dead in Israeli strikes on central Beirut
- NBA boss Silver sees games back in China 'at some point'
- Israel strikes central Beirut, killing 22
- Table tennis and Netflix push Ukraine teen into French Open contention
- Civilians flee Gaza's Jabalia in tightening Israeli siege
- Israel strikes central Beirut, killing 18
- At least 10 dead in Florida from tornadoes caused by Hurricane Milton
- Warhol's rare 'Queen' collection opens at Dutch museum
- Three-time NBA champion Green retires
- MLB Twins up for sale after 40 years
- S.Sudan floods affect 893,000, over 241,000 displaced: UN
- Solar storm could impact US hurricane recovery efforts: agency
- Windies sweat on injury to 'crucial' Taylor at World Cup
- Lebanon says 11 dead, 48 injured in Israeli strikes on Beirut
- Panama lashes out at EU over tax haven 'outrage'
- Erdogan says Gaza 'shame of humanity', calls for permanent ceasfire
- TD Bank to pay more than $3 bn to US in money-laundering case
- SAfrica prosecutors drop criminal complaint against president
- 'Good opportunity': Nagelsmann upbeat despite Germany's long injury list
- Hurricane whips up bitter US election battle
- Cameroon bans media talk of president's health amid rumours
- NFL MVP Jackson and rookie phenom Daniels set for showdown
- Chad's capital under threat as floodwaters rise
- Lebanon state media says Israeli strikes hit central Beirut
- No answers on strike on reporters in Lebanon one year on: watchdog
- Ramharack picks four wickets as Windies beat Bangladesh in Women's T20 World Cup
- France's City of Light switches to climate-resilient power cables
- Djokovic hails Nadal 'legacy' as Alcaraz in 'shock' over retirement
- Obama hits campaign trail for Harris
- Delta eyes Election Day travel pullback as profits climb
- Djokovic tells Nadal: 'Your legacy will live forever'
- Ethel Kennedy, wife of RFK, dead at 96
- Zelensky denies ceasefire with Russia under discussion on trip
US Supreme Court appears inclined to rein in federal agencies
The conservative-leaning US Supreme Court on Wednesday appeared inclined to weaken the power of federal agencies, which regulate myriad issues affecting the everyday lives of Americans -- from consumer safety to air pollution.
At the heart of the matter is a 1984 ruling in Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council, which said judges should defer to government agencies in determining a "reasonable" interpretation of the law if the language is ambiguous.
At the time, the case was a win for the administration of Republican president Ronald Reagan, who accused the country's progressive federal judges of burying corporate America under masses of unnecessary and restrictive red tape.
But the political right has since decried the ruling, saying it unfairly empowers the central government over the judiciary, and means agencies can alter the meaning of statutes, depending on who's in charge.
On Wednesday, the nine justices barely touched the facts of the current case on the docket, which relates to a rule requiring fishing boats in the US northeast to pay for federal observers boarding their vessels to keep watch on overfishing.
Instead, they quickly pivoted to how the precedent set in the Chevron case affected the proceedings -- and how that 1984 ruling might be outdated.
- 'Flood of litigation' -
Elizabeth Prelogar, representing the administration of Democratic President Joe Biden, argued that overruling the Chevron decision would spark an "unwarranted shock to the legal system."
She warned that lower courts could get clogged with cases, and a situation could arise where statutes would be interpreted differently in various states based on the interpretation of judges.
"You lose the uniformity value, and it diminishes the force of the political accountability value," she said.
But most of the six right-leaning justices seemed unmoved by her arguments.
"Chevron itself ushers in shocks to the system every four or eight years when a new administration comes in -- whether it's communications law, or securities law or competition law, environmental law..." said Justice Brett Kavanaugh.
The court's three progressive justices, all women, called for maintaining the status quo.
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, a Biden appointee, said she was "worried about the courts becoming uber-legislators."
"Isn't it sort of impractical and chaotic to have a world in which every undefined term in a statute is subject to litigation, if you're trying to govern?" she said.
For Justice Elena Kagan, "it's best to defer to people who do know, who have had long experience on the ground."
"Judges should know what they don't know," Kagan added.
Amy Coney Barrett, who was appointed by Biden's Republican predecessor Donald Trump and whose vote could be decisive for the majority, asked about the possibility of an eventual "flood of litigation."
The court's decision is not expected for several months.
In June 2022, the Supreme Court had already limited the power of federal agencies to an extent.
It ruled that the Environmental Protection Agency did not have overarching power to regulate emissions from coal-fired power plants, saying that "it is not credible that Congress gave the EPA the authority to pass such a measure."
M.Fischer--AMWN