- Sinner reaches Shanghai final, will end year number one
- China-EU EV tariff talks in Brussels end with 'major differences': Beijing
- Sabalenka downs Gauff in three sets to reach Wuhan final
- Israel warns south Lebanon residents to 'not return'
- Sinner tames Machac to reach Shanghai Masters final
- Buried Nazi past haunts Athens on liberation anniversary
- Harris to release medical report confirming fitness for presidency: campaign
- Nobel prize a timely reminder, Hiroshima locals say
- Hezbollah fires at Israel as wars rage on Yom Kippur
- Analysts warn more detail needed on new China economic measures
- China tees up fresh spending to boost ailing economy
- China says will issue special bonds to boost ailing economy
- China offers $325 bn in fiscal stimulus for ailing economy
- Dodgers drop Padres 2-0 to advance in MLB playoffs
- Alexei Navalny wrote he knew he would die in prison in new memoir
- Last-minute legal ruling allows betting on US election
- Despite hurricanes, Floridians refuse to leave 'paradise'
- Israel observes Yom Kippur amid firestorm over Lebanon strikes
- Trump demonizes migrants in dark, misleading speech
- X says 'alert' to manipulation efforts after pro-Russia bots report
- US, European markets rise before Boeing unveils sweeping job cuts
- Small Quebec company dominates one part of NHL hockey: jerseys
- Comoros shock Tunisia, Salah, Mbeumo strike in AFCON qualifiers
- Boeing to cut 10% of workforce as it sees big Q3 loss
- Germany win in Nations League as 10-man Dutch rescue point
- Undav brace sends Germany to victory against Bosnia
- Israel says fired at 'threat' near UN position in Lebanon
- Want to film in Paris? No sexism allowed
- Ecuador's last mountain iceman dies at 80
- Milton leaves at least 16 dead, millions without power in Florida
- Senegal set to announce breakaway development agenda: PM
- UN says 2 peacekeepers wounded in south Lebanon explosions
- Injury-hit Australia thrash 'embarrassing' Pakistan at Women's T20 World Cup
- Internal TikTok documents show prioritization of traffic over well-being
- Israel says fired at 'immediate threat' near UN position in Lebanon
- New US coach Pochettino hails Pulisic but worries over workload
- Brazil orders closure of 2,000 betting sites
- UK govt urged to raise pro-democracy tycoon's case with China
- Sculptor Lalanne's animal creations sell for $59 mn
- From Tesla to Trump: Behind Musk's giant leap into politics
- US, European markets rise as investors weigh rates, earnings
- In Colombia, children trade plastic waste for school supplies
- Supercharged hurricanes trigger 'perfect storm' for disinformation
- JPMorgan Chase profits top estimates, bank sees 'resilient' US economy
- Djokovic proves staying power as he progresses to Shanghai semi-finals
- Sheffield Utd boss Wilder 'numb' after Baldock death
- Little progress at key meet ahead of COP29 climate summit
- Fans immerse themselves in Marina Abramovic's first China exhibition
- Israel says conducting review after UN peacekeepers wounded in Lebanon
- 'Party atmosphere': Skygazers treated to another aurora show
US Supreme Court weighs race and politics in gerrymandering case
The US Supreme Court heard a case touching on the thorny issues of race and politics on Wednesday that could help determine whether Democrats or Republicans control the House of Representatives next year.
The high-stakes case before the court involves a challenge to a congressional district map drawn up by the Republican-majority legislature in South Carolina.
It is one of several legal battles involving racial gerrymandering -- the manipulation of electoral maps that dilutes the voting power of minorities -- winding their way through the US courts.
In the South Carolina case, a three-judge panel ruled in January that a congressional district redrawn in the state after the 2020 US census was an illegal racial gerrymander and ordered it to be reconfigured before the November 2024 election.
The redrawn congressional map moved 60 percent of the Black residents of the coastal city of Charleston -- nearly 30,000 people -- from one district into another which already had a Black majority.
Six of the current members of the House from South Carolina are white and one is Black.
The South Carolina legislature challenged the lower court's ruling and appeared to get a sympathetic hearing on Wednesday from several of the conservative justices on the nation's highest court, where conservatives hold a 6-3 majority.
"Disentangling race and politics, in a situation like this, is very, very difficult," said Chief Justice John Roberts.
John Gore, representing the South Carolina Senate, said the Republican-led legislature had pursued the legally permissible objective of increasing their party's vote share and had not engaged in a racial gerrymander.
"It achieved that goal by moving Republicans into the district and Democrats out of the district," Gore said. "All of the direct evidence confirms that it used political data, not racial data, to identify Republicans and Democrats."
Leah Aden, counsel for the Legal Defense Fund, which brought the case along with the American Civil Liberties Union and the civil rights group the NAACP, dismissed the claim and said "all the evidence reflects that they were looking at race."
"Black Democrat voters were significantly and disproportionately targeted for movement," Aden said, urging the Supreme Court to uphold the district court's ruling.
- Other redistricting cases -
The South Carolina case is one of a number of congressional redistricting cases being fought in the courts following the release of the 2020 census data.
A panel of federal judges approved a new congressional map for the southern state of Alabama this month that includes a second electoral district with a large population of African Americans, who tend to largely vote Democratic.
"The law requires the creation of an additional district that affords Black Alabamians, like everyone else, a fair and reasonable opportunity to elect candidates of their choice," they said.
Black voters represent around a quarter of registered voters in Alabama but are in a majority in only one of the state's seven US House districts.
The new map was drawn up after the Supreme Court ruled in June that the redistricting plan adopted by Alabama for the 2022 congressional elections violated the 1965 Voting Rights Act, which was passed by Congress during the civil rights movement to prevent racial discrimination at the polls.
Roberts and Justice Brett Kavanaugh, both conservatives, joined the three liberal justices to fashion the 5-4 majority in the Alabama case.
A congressional map in Louisiana is also facing a legal challenge on the grounds it results in just one Black majority district although African Americans make up 30 percent of the southern state's population.
Republicans currently hold a slim 221-212 majority in the House and an increase in the number of Black majority districts could tip the balance in next year's congressional elections, when all 435 House seats will be up for grabs.
The Supreme Court is expected to issue a ruling in the South Carolina case by January.
P.Costa--AMWN