
-
Trossard starts for Arsenal in Champions League semi against PSG
-
Sweden shooting kills three: police
-
Real Madrid's Rudiger, Mendy out injured until end of season
-
Dubois' trainer accuses Usyk of 'conning boxing world'
-
Femke Bol targets fast return after draining 2024
-
Asterix, Obelix and Netflix: US streamer embraces Gallic heroes
-
Watson wins Tour de Romandie prologue, Evenepoel eighth
-
Amazon says never decided to show tariff costs, after White House backlash
-
India gives army 'operational freedom' to respond to Kashmir attack
-
Stocks advance as investors weigh earnings, car tariff hopes
-
Canadian firm makes first bid for international seabed mining license
-
Kardashian robbery suspect says heist was one 'too many'
-
'Chilled' Swiatek scrapes into Madrid Open last eight
-
Interconnectivity: the cornerstone of the European electricity network
-
France accuses Russian military intelligence of cyberattacks
-
Multiple challenges await Canada's Carney
-
US consumer confidence hits lowest level since onset of pandemic
-
How climate change turned Sao Paulo's drizzle into a storm
-
Video game rides conclave excitement with cardinal fantasy team
-
Candles and radios in demand in Spain as blackout lessons sink in
-
Boca Juniors sack coach Gago ahead of Club World Cup
-
Trump celebrates tumultuous 100 days in office as support slips
-
Forest face 'biggest games of careers' in Champions League chase: Nuno
-
Stocks waver as investors weigh earnings, car tariff hopes
-
US climate assessment in doubt as Trump dismisses authors
-
W. House slams Amazon over 'hostile' plan to display tariff effect on prices
-
What we know ahead of conclave to elect new pope
-
EU top court rules 'golden passport' schemes are illegal
-
Mounds of waste dumped near Athens's main river: NGO
-
Spain starts probing causes of massive blackout
-
France targets cheap Chinese goods with fee on packages
-
Amnesty accuses Israel of 'live-streamed genocide' in Gaza
-
Japan, Philippines leaders vow to deepen security ties
-
AstraZeneca moves some production to US amid tariff threat
-
Shadman's ton gives Bangladesh lead in 2nd Zimbabwe Test
-
Barca's Yamal: I admire Messi but don't compare myself to him
-
Pfizer profits dip on lower Paxlovid sales
-
French right-wing TV host fans talk of presidential bid
-
Two men in court charged with 'moronic' felling of famed UK tree
-
Amnesty accuses Israel of 'live-streamed genocide' against Gazans
-
Spotify posts record profit in first quarter
-
Sciver-Brunt named as England women's cricket captain
-
GM profits top estimates, but automaker reviewing outlook due to tariffs
-
Stock markets edge up as Trump softens tariff pain for auto firms
-
Pricier trainers? Adidas warns on US tariff impact
-
Spain, Portugal rule out cyberattack for massive blackout
-
Suryavanshi, 14, dubbed India's next superstar after shattering records
-
Power back in Spain, Portugal after massive blackout
-
Pakistan says it shot down Indian drone along Kashmir border
-
Cardinals run the media gauntlet ahead of conclave

Biden's student debt relief plan challenged at Supreme Court
The US Supreme Court heard arguments Tuesday in a challenge to President Joe Biden's plan to erase nearly $400 billion of student debt, with all eyes on how far the conservative-dominated bench is willing to go to override the Democratic leader.
The court's ruling, expected before June 30, will decide whether millions of Americans will see up to $20,000 of debt disappear, but could also have implications for future presidential actions.
About 200 protesters gathered outside the court, carrying signs backing Biden's policy.
Lamar Brooks, 22, an African American student from Baltimore, said he already had $18,000 of debt and expected the sum to rocket as he hopes to study to become a psychiatrist.
"I could benefit, and also it will help other minorities as well," he told AFP, saying student debt was a "generational financial burden."
Relying on a Covid-related legal justification, Biden announced his student loan forgiveness plan last August, shortly before the crucial midterm elections.
"This relief is critical to over 40 million Americans as they recover from the economic crisis caused by the pandemic," he tweeted early Tuesday.
"We're confident it's legal. And we're fighting for it in court."
Republican-led states were quick to claim he had overreached his authority and an appellate court halted the measure in November.
Under the relief plan, $10,000 would be cut from all loans owed by people earning less than $125,000 per year. For students who went to university with need-based government assistance known as Pell grants, the relief would be $20,000.
In addition to the coalition of Republican states, two students have also filed suit arguing they were unjustly excluded from the program.
During his 2020 campaign, Biden pledged to act to address the massive amounts of debt US students take on to attend higher education -- the White House says nearly 43 million Americans hold $1.6 trillion in federal student loans.
- Wide range of outcomes -
In the early days of the Covid-19 pandemic, then-president Donald Trump ordered a halt to all federal student loan repayments, citing a 2003 law permitting such actions during a "national emergency."
That pause has since been repeatedly renewed, and is currently set to expire in mid-2023.
The Biden administration argues the same law allows for blanket debt cancellation in response to a "once-in-a-century pandemic that starkly disrupted the Nation's economy and borrowers' ability to repay their loans."
Conservatives claim Biden has used the pandemic as a broad excuse to sidestep Congress.
That argument could prevail in the Supreme Court, which has already moved to overturn multiple Covid-related policies issued by the Democratic administration, including on vaccine mandates and a moratorium on evictions.
Biden's Justice Department contends that the Republican states have no legal standing to bring the case as they have "suffered no cognizable injury," and that the two students' challenge is overly broad.
For their part, Republicans are hoping that the panel's 6-3 conservative majority will issue a broad ruling to limit presidential authority, saying that on such important issues the US Constitution requires clear authorization from Congress.
The court used this "major questions doctrine" last June to restrict the powers of the Environmental Protection Agency in its fight against global warming.
If the court further strengthens the doctrine, the Biden administration may find itself unable to act on crucial issues at a time when Congress itself is paralyzed by partisan divisions.
P.Stevenson--AMWN